Home Contents

Introduction
Proposal
Urgency
Action
Mission
Petition
Articles
News
Links
Contact us
Marriage Blog
Prayer
Oral Submissions

 

Press Releases

The following are press releases that have been issued regarding the the constitutional courts ruling, that the definition of marriage be changed from a “union between a man and a woman to a “union between two persons".

PRESS R E L E A S E

Reaction by the House of Traditional Leaders

Last years reaction by House of Traditional Leaders

Gay marriage decision slammed 14/12/2005 11:41   - (SA)    Sizwe samaYende

Nelspruit - Traditional leaders have warned that homosexual couples risk being treated as pariahs in rural communities following last week's
Constitutional Court ruling endorsing same-sex marriages.

The National House of Traditional Leaders (NHTL) members unanimously agreed during a three-day conference in Hazyview, Mpumalanga, that the ruling disappointed them.

"We are of the belief that, based on viewpoints of rural communities, this [ruling] will cause same-sex married couples to be ostracised, which is something that is not promoted by the institution and might lead to victimisation and violence," said NHTL spokesperson Sibusiso Nkosi.

Nkosi said that the leaders believed that same-sex marriages were at variance with African culture, and the decision went against the mandate
of the NHTL to protect and promote the customs of communities that observe customary law.

"Traditional leaders have vowed to make it their mission for the coming fives years to campaign against this wicked, decadent and immoral western practice," he said.

The house, said Nkosi, would study the Constitutional Court's judgement and decide on the steps to take in order to challenge the ruling. "This kind of marriage does not fulfil the notion of marriage in African culture, as only a man can pay lobola for a woman," he said.
The conference also deliberated on a number of issues especially on lobola, governance and laws regulating traditional leadership.

Escalating lobola prices were condemned, but it was agreed that no legislation was needed to regulate lobola. The leaders committed themselves to working with all spheres of government, and urged the justice department to speed the process of finalising legislation on traditional courts.

[Back to top]


The Southern African Catholic Bishops Conference reiterates the Church's teaching as laid out in the Catechism of the Catholic Church #2357

"Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex."

It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained.

Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law.  They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity.  Under no circumstances can they be approved'.

To summarize, all homosexual acts are declared to be intrinsically disordered. Therefore they cannot under any circumstance be approved.

The reasons why they are said to be intrinsically disordered are:

  1.. They are contrary to the natural law,
  2.. They close the sexual act to the gift of life and
  3.. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity.

Scripture passages that the Church uses for its teaching include this passage from St Paul's Letter to the Romans:

For this reason, God gave them up to degrading passions. Their women exchanged natural intercourse for unnatural, and in the same way also the men, giving up natural intercourse with women, were consumed with passion for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in their own persons the due penalty for their error. (Rom 1: 26)

Relevant Questions

Among the questions being asked about the Church's reaction to the Constitutional Court's ruling are the following:
 
a.. Can the Church impose its values on society?
 
The answer depends on a number of considerations:

a.. If human beings do not have a Creator, in other words, if human beings have total knowledge, wisdom and power to create themselves, then the answer is No. The Church cannot impose its values on anyone, because the Church takes its authority from the infinite God.
   
b.. If the Church and Society believe and accept as a given that there is an all holy, all knowing and all powerful God who created everything including human beings, and created them to exist and live according to his Will and Laws, then the Church not only can but also must proclaim and work for the acceptance and submission to the values that God has revealed to us.

b.. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, so how can the Catholic Church take issue with it?

It is true that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, but in order to be binding on the consciences of its citizens it must conform to the Law of God. And in this case it clearly does not.
Indeed if the S.A. Constitution is being made to supersede the reveale will of God then South Africa is morally doomed. For no one can go against God's Will and come away unscathed.
 
         The fact that same sex marriages are approved by the Constitutional Court, that does not make them morally right.

        The Church has the prophetic duty to point out where the Constitution runs counter to the Commandments of God, our Maker's Instructions which determine how          human beings are to live good and moral lives.

c) What is the Church going to do about this situation?

  a.. Taking our lead from the Scriptures our first action is Prayer, prayer for a change of heart on the part of all who are responsible for flaunting God's Law;
  b.. Second we will continue teaching and preaching the truth revealed by God's Word about human sexuality and its proper use in marriage.
  c.. Thirdly we will mobilize the Faithful and all people of goodwill to work together to save our nation and country from the disasters that befall any people that           turns its back on its God.
The legalizing of same sex marriages is doomed to have a morally deleterious effect on the institution of the family, traditionally defined as the permanent union between husband and wife.

+ Wilfrid Cardinal Napier, OFM
President of the Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference
Tel 031 303 1417
Fax 031 312 1848

[Back to top]


Letter to parliamentarians 18 September 2006 by ChristianView Network

18 September 2006

Dear Member of Parliament

Comments by Members of Parliament on a Constitutional Amendment to protect Marriage

We sent a proposal with a response form to consult you on the idea of a Constitutional Amendment to protect the definition of marriage on 14 June 2006. The following are the written responses we received from Members of Parliament in six different political parties:


· “It is inconceivable that either the serving lawmakers or the sitting judges would contemplate a marriage between themselves and persons of the same sex, nor do I think that the constituent assembly intended to imply same-sex marriages.”
· “If the majority of Christians in this country are sincerely Christian they will have to make a choice between God and man made law. They will have to take a stand to the glory of God. There is no middle way. Those who want to obey God and need God for protection, blessing and success should come together in solidarity against all evil and this bill.”
· “I don’t support same-sex marriage because it is against God’s law. If you adopt a child in that situation, it will affect the child’s mind. The child won’t even distinguish between mother and father and the roles they have to play as parents.”
· “It is a pity that leaders of some religious institutions are also confused and allowed themselves to be co-opted to drive the ‘same-sex marriage’ agenda.”
· “I am totally against same-sex marriage.”
· “As a Christian I believe that marriage was created by God when he gave Eve to Adam as a wife. He said to them: ‘multiply and replenish the earth’.”
· “Same-sex marriage is not recognised by the Holy Book, hence not negotiable”
· “I agree fully with reasons put forward in your circular letter. These reasons should form the basis for elaborate discussion on this matter. As a result the majority of parliamentarians and the general public should be convinced of the undesirability of the ‘recognition’.”
· “Leviticus 18:22, 20:13”
· ‘I consider myself a married man because my wife and I constitute a family.”
· “You will be pleasantly surprised that the leader of our party, Kgosi L. M. Mangope put it categorically as a matter of policy that he and the party will not accept ‘same-sex marriages’. My Church has come up with a policy position that same-sex marriages/unions should not be recognised and that should a pastor officiate over such marriage, such a pastor will be struck off the roll. I therefore fully subscribe to these two positions.”
· “Thanks for your good work. May God bless your work and give us the victory in His time.”

One parliamentarian phoned to promise she would vote for the constitutional amendment and against ‘same-sex marriage’ even if it cost her seat.

What you can do to defend the sanctity of marriage:

· Please oppose the proposed ‘Civil Unions Bill’.
- It is misleadingly named, since it gives same-sex couples almost all the same legal rights as married people and even allows the word ‘marriage’ to be used in the ceremony vows.
- It also includes the legalisation of ‘partnership rights’ for opposite sex couples who live together outside of marriage, whether registered or unregistered. This is radical and highly controversial legislation for which there is no need or urgency to consider and which needs to be separated from the proposed Civil Unions Bill or scrapped. It impacts the rights of spouses and children of those legitimately married under customary law. Nevertheless the bill is not planned to go to the House of Traditional Leaders. Many unmarried couples may chose this instead of marriage, thus giving their children less security than those with married parents.
- Most legal experts including Christians, state advisers and homosexual militants agree the Bill does not comply with the requirements of the 1 December 2005 Constitutional Court ruling. We therefore don’t understand the purpose of the bill and suggest it be scrapped.

· There has been an attempt to justify the short time for public consultation based on claimed consultation by government with the SA Law Reform Commission (SALRC), which had a prior public consultation process. Reality is that there has been very little communication between government and the SALRC and government has not accepted the recommendations of the SALRC process on ‘same-sex marriage’ or civil unions or even allowed them to be published. The process thus needs much more time. Please encourage the Department of Home Affairs to apply to the Constitutional Court for an extension of time in order to avoid parliament rushing through a poorly considered piece of legislation.

· To keep up to date with this issue, please visit http://defendmarriage.blogspot.com/

· A private members bill seeking a Constitutional Amendment to protect the sanctity of marriage has been tabled by ACDP MP Steve Swart. The bill reads “Amendment of section 39 of Act 108 of 1996 1. Section 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, is hereby amended by the addition of the following subsection: “(4) The Constitution shall be interpreted to mean that a marriage is a voluntary union of a man and a woman.” It will be referred to the committee on private members bills and petitions. This is the same proposal we consulted you on in our previous letter of 14 June 2006, and which those above supported. Please urgently support the speedy passage of this Constitutional Amendment bill before 1 December 2006 cut off date. If this bill is passed before 1 December 2006, then the legal definition of marriage will not change.

· Please support the call by many Members of Parliament for a free conscience vote on this important issue.

Yours sincerely,
Philip Rosenthal

[Back to top]


Constitution is anti-life, says cardinal

October 09 2006 at 08:44AM

This article was originally published on page 3 of The Star on October 09, 2006

By Nomusa Cembi

Cardinal Wilfrid Napier, president of the Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference, has described the South African constitution as "fiercely anti-life through its drive to promote contraception, abortion on demand and same-sex marriages".

He was speaking to Catholic educators at a conference at Sacred Heart College in Johannesburg at the weekend.

The constitution, he said, was being placed above all else, replacing the wisdom drawn from the human family and what had been there for generations.

"Human beings cannot function without a deity," Napier said.

People were not challenging these aspects of the constitution because they did not want to be seen as unpatriotic, undemocratic and racist.


"It's not on," Napier said. "It's against nature. It is against what marriage was intended for - to have children. That kind of activity cannot bring life. There is no way we can give a person the right to do something that is morally wrong."

Napier said while there was a vision for Catholic education, it was equally critical to keep an eye on what was happening in general education.

He said general education was marked by violence, lack of respect, loss of respect for traditional values, lack of delivery of resources and a lack of delivery of quality education.

There was evidence to show that general education had a vision but it was ideologically based and pushed by the ruling party.

General education had excluded God, especially His role in human affairs.

Napier also said there was a campaign to make churches critical of government.

The root cause of the malaise in general education resulted from the denial of God.

Napier said the necessary response to this would be to draw out in children what was in them: the core values of every religion and in any spirituality.

He said discipline should be instilled in children from an early age. He called for the use of wisdom gained from campaigns such as Standing For the Truth Campaign of the the apartheid era.

"The campaign said we would not submit to immoral laws. It took the form of defiance campaigns," he said.

Napier said political correctness was moving people further away from the truth.

"I hear people addressing God as 'He' or 'She'. Political correctness tells us to do so, but is it the truth?" he asked.



"These are the key values that education needs to underline. Most young people are searching and looking for meaning in their lives.

"They are trying to find the key values they will need to have to appreciate who they are, where they are and why they are," Napier said.

[Back to top]


SACBC PASTORAL LETTER ON MARRIAGE AND FAMILY LIFE

Dear Brother and Sisters, especially you who are Fathers and Mothers, Husbands and Wives, Sons and Daughters in Catholic Families,

On Christmas Day 2005 our Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI released his first pastoral letter calling it “God is Love.” He instructs us to make sure that God’s love is present in the world, so that “God’s way of loving becomes the measure of human love”. This is what makes the ideal of marriage a mirror image of the love of God.

In this pastoral letter we, your Bishops, want to show that this love of God is at the heart of family life and is the unique gift that God gives to the Church and to the world through the family.

The late Pope John Paul II spoke of “the future of the Church and of the world [as] passing through the family.” In 1994 the African Synod saw the Bishops of Africa searching for a way to bring out the main qualities of African culture in an appropriate description of the Church. The bishops ended up with the image of “Church as the Family of God”. They reminded us that the family is the domestic church, because that is where we learn and practice day by day “care for others, solidarity, warmth in human relationships, acceptance, dialogue and trust.”

The Catholic Family today.

As we search for the true meaning of the family in today’s world we turn first to the documents of the Second Vatican Council, which describe marriage as the way of holiness for the couple and as the natural ideal foundation of the family.

Following Vatican 2 the Synod on the Family in 1980 defined the family as an “intimate community of life and of love.” A family is bound together for life and based on relationships of blood, marriage or adoption.

In the eyes of that Synod the family has four specific tasks:

1.       to form itself into such an intimate community.

2.       to nurture life from conception to natural death.

3.       to build up society and finally

4.       to share in the evangelizing mission of the church, by receiving and passing on the Good News of Jesus Christ, from parents to children, and from member to member.

 

We live in an extremely secularized world, a far cry from the ideal that we are holding up as Christians. Of particular concern is the small number of young couples that begin their life together with the blessings of the Sacrament of Matrimony. Of equal concern is the number of marriages, even those blessed in Church, that end in divorce.  A third concern is the number of married couples who, even though they stay together, live so far apart that their marriage can in no way be said to represent, or even less reflect, the union of Christ with his Church which is the mystery that the Sacrament is meant to portray.

Another consequence of secularism is the erosion of traditional family structures, which are such a necessary support for the cultures of our people. In the secular worldview sex has been taken out of its proper context and made into a form of entertainment. Is it any wonder therefore that there is such a glaring lack of commitment, immorality and dishonesty?  A third serious consequence is our nation’s ineffectual effort to deal with the scourge of HIV/AIDS.

To the extent that the changes in the roles of men and women contribute to the fostering and strengthening of marriage and family life, they are good and desirable. However, where such changes lead to increased individualism or where they damage parent-child relationships they are to be decried and resisted.

How does the Church respond? What does the Church offer us? 

Christians are first and foremost people of faith, hope and love. This is why the African Synod says: “ With the practical help offered by strong and committed Christian families, dioceses will develop the family apostolate as part of their overall pastoral plan.” The Christian family as “the domestic Church” should strive to build on the noble values of the African tradition in particular the caring and sharing across generations which we know as “ubuntu.”

It was to single out this important aspect of The Family, that our own Pastoral Forum of 2000 gave priority of treatment to strengthening family life, together with ongoing adult formation. This falls in line with the rich teaching on marriage and family life given by Vatican 2 and the Synod of Bishops as mentioned above.

As a further step to give Marriage and Family life the importance it deserves, the Bishops’ Conference has set up a Family Life Desk within the Department for Evangelisation. The Desk is committed to promoting this apostolate of the Family. Dioceses and parishes have been asked too to appoint family life coordinators to promote this apostolate at local level. One of the initiatives is the current three yearly Marriage Awareness campaign which dioceses and parishes have already been asked to take up and follow through.  The highlight of this is a suggested celebration of Marriage Day on 8th October. 

Because we your Bishops realize the crucial importance of this work with, for and by Catholic families, we ask all parishes, through their different structures, especially Small Christian Communities, Faith Sharing Groups, Sodalities and Movements to make the building up of good Catholic families the top priority.

Much is said in society and in the Church about restoring family values, the most recent example being the TV programme Heartlines. That is not the task of society alone, but the task especially of evangelised and evangelising families. It is the task of the Church as Family of God. That is God’s will and God’s way, for the future of the Church and the world.

We, your Bishops, are like Shepherds filled with concern for their flocks. We believe in this mission, this calling to marriage and family life. We pray with you for the intercession of the Holy Family for the much-needed growth in your vocation.

Bishops of Southern Africa

Date.   12 September 2006

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

At the 2000 Pastoral Forum bishops and lay representatives identified the strengthening of family life in the home and ongoing adult faith formation as priorities. Pastoral councils, other groups such as Small Christian Communities and sodalities as well as families in the home can reflect and discuss the following.

  • What are the most urgent needs with regard to marriage and family life in our community at this time?
  • What programmes and support structures exist in our community for building healthy families?
  • What can we do to ensure that marriage and family life is supported in our community?

The SACBC Family Life Desk can be contacted through 012 323 6458 or trowland@sacbc.org.za to provide a comprehensive list of movements, programmes and resources for the family apostolate.

[Back to top]

 

Send mail to info@defendmarriage.co.za with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 07/19/06